July 3, Author: By Margery Weinstein A recent article online explored the possibilities of non-hierarchical leadership, a concept I find appealing. Rather than having a fixed hierarchy so that one person in a work group is always a leader, one company allows for varying leadership, depending on the challenge that is being addressed.
This ushers managers the room to sustain and companies to leverage their strengths. Nevertheless for companies that aim to embark on new strategies, they need sustainable and competent leadership. This is possible only in highly dynamic environment, where hierarchical leadership structures are surpassed by innovation.
Such an environment provides opportunities to employees regardless of their rank and helps propel the company into a commanding position through collaborative and participatory leadership.
This type of leadership seeks to involve others in decision making, is strongly ethical, and assures the career growth of employees along with better quality of work-life.
The business leadership has now been dominated by managers who ruled their enterprises from the top down. In earlier times, influence of two World Wars was very evident, as the organizational hierarchies were designed similar to that in military, with an extensive hierarchy to establish control through rules and processes.
In the late twentieth century the short term nature of stock market, caused business leaders to focus on myopic gains which side-lined the long-term growth.
This not only manifested itself in jitters like the ethical debacles exposed by Enron and WorldCom but also showed up in the Wall Street meltdown. Due to this, people started doubting the calibre of corporate leaders in structuring a sustainable institution since they were self-centric and myopic in intent.
Ever wondered what could have probably gone wrong in whatever transpired? The new generation work force is not willing to wait in queue for getting promoted and seek more and more opportunities.
They are focussed more on job satisfaction apart from the monetary benefits that they are entitled to. In many companies employees are motivated by the mission and values of the organization. Dynamic leaders are more focused on customers.
Hierarchical leaders aimed only nearby goals and are oblivious of the larger picture. I only work for my customers. This helps empower the leaders and makes them perform through collaboration within the organization.
That can only mean good things for the future of non-hierarchical leadership development." - Concepts & Connections: Teaching Leadership "One of the key strengths of this book is Price: Non-hierarchical Clustering Methods A non-hierarchical method generates a classification by partitioning a dataset, giving a set of (generally) non-overlapping groups having no hierarchical relationships between them. Hierarchical Level and Leadership Style ARTHUR G. JAGO AND VICTOR H. VROOM School of Organization and Management, Yale University The relationship between leadership style and hierarchical level was very high. Your success, which you are inclined to attribute principally to good luck and to a few timely decisions on your part has, in.
The following characteristics of these collaborative leaders contribute to their meaningful practice of non-hierarchical leadership: They need to possess a strong commitment to listening others intently. They need to listen receptively to what is being explicit and implicit.
Reflection in the interim is conducive for the growth and advancement.
Traditional hierarchical leadership has been proved to be out of place and it has never been able to tackle the work place deviance. Diligent alignment of employees makes them responsible for the larger good of the organization which is something greater than their individual gains.
The manner in which hierarchical leadership exercises its power is through command and taking total control of their subordinates.
On the contrary, the non-hierarchical leadership traits enable the leaders to take control of the position by empowering the various leaders at different designations. The leaders at every level thus set excellent work standards for others to emulate in a conducive and collaborative atmosphere.
The satisfaction out of this kind of quality work surpasses the feelings of individualistic and myopic gains. New generation leadership believe that employees possess an intrinsic value apart from their tangible work performance.
So, they are religiously committed for the growth of every single employee within the company.
The leader should sense the innate responsibility of nurturing the professional and personal growth of the employees, off course within their gamut of power. Customer satisfaction and purposeful employees becomes the key for sustainable competitive advantage.
The leaders need to be persuasive and convincing others for taking a course of action, rather than using their positional authority for coercion. This aspect offers a very lucid distinction between the traditional authoritarian leadership model and the collaborative leadership model.
Collaboration within the organization, with the customers and consumers and with the suppliers is a prerequisite for sustained solutions and services. It needs the leader to place himself in the position of a person of a different age or generation while working towards sustainable solutions.
Summarizing the process - From Command to Collaborate: The changing nature of the complexity of the business problems have brought out the inability of the organizations and individuals in solving it for lasting results.Hierarchical definition is - of, relating to, or arranged in a hierarchy.
How to use hierarchical in a sentence. The Good, The Bad, & The Semantically Imprecise - 9/ Learn More from M-W. Please Don't Whinge About Being Knackered, You Prat. Jan 25, · Human leadership within the church is non-hierarchical.
Scripture tells us that there are human leaders within the church: Hebrews , "Remember your leaders, those who . That can only mean good things for the future of non-hierarchical leadership development." - Concepts & Connections: Teaching Leadership "One of the key strengths of this book is Price: Sep 30, · You've probably worked with and reported to hierarchical and non-hierarchical leaders.
You've probably wondered which is more effective. At times, you may have been critical of hierarchical organizations that put a particular goal and outcome above the good of the people effecting the outcome. So the following except for an article on June 3, in The Wall Street Journal by Robert.
A recent article online explored the possibilities of non-hierarchical leadership, a concept I find appealing. Rather than having a fixed hierarchy so that one person in a work group is always a leader, one company allows for varying leadership, depending on the challenge that is being addressed.
Characteristics of Hierarchical Leadership. A hierarchy is a logical organizational structure in which power belongs to the position rather than the individual.
The risk of an organization's.