When printing this page, you must include the entire legal notice. This material may not be published, reproduced, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed without permission. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our terms and conditions of fair use. Students, members of the community, and users worldwide will find information to assist with many writing projects.
Men are told to think like a woman and women are told to act like a man. But the advice tends to reinforce stereotypical traits like empathy for women and aggressiveness for men.
And while these stereotypes are often exaggerated, research shows gender characteristics do exist and play an influential role in the workplace. Indeed, men and women can be just as different in the professional world as they are in their personal lives.
What executives are just beginning to understand is that these differences can be great for business. When it comes to problem solving — particularly in business — you need a balance of both perspectives.
According to available research, here are some strengths of each gender in the workplace: In another study by Caliper, a professional services consulting companywomen demonstrated higher levels of compassion and team-building skills.
Women leaders scored significantly higher than male leaders in persuasiveness and assertiveness, according to the Caliper study.
A international study by Accenture found that 70 percent of businesswomen asked their bosses for new challenges at work, compared to less than half of businessmen polled. As women ask for more to do, they are likely to work longer hours than their male counterparts.
Polls by career site theFit showed that 54 percent of women worked 9 to 11 hour days compared to 41 percent of men.
The Accenture study found that men were more likely to be early adopters of technology and tended to rely on technology more than their female counterparts. Men demonstrate strengths in negotiation. More than half of the male students negotiated higher salaries, while only 7 percent of female students did so.
Other research by Accenture shows that only 45 percent of women would be willing to ask for a raise, compared to 61 percent of men.
On the other hand, no matter how thoroughly prepared women are, they tend to feel unprepared. Men score more promotions than women, and that may be explained by who they mingle with in the office.
Among participants of a Catalyst survey on mentorship, 72 percent of men received promotions by compared to 65 percent of women.
This difference is an issue of access. Sociology researchers Lisa Torres and Matt L. Huffman found in a study that both men and women build social networks comprised of people of the same gender.
As upper management still tends to be male dominated, this places men in a better position to receive promotions from their mentors.So, You are Applying to Business School with a Low GPA or GMAT Score. First, are your numbers really so bad?
|A Socratic Perspective on the Nature of Human Evil||Read More Applying To Olin Olin College prepares students to become exemplary engineering innovators who recognize needs, design solutions and engage in creative enterprises for the good of the world.|
|EVOLUTION TRENDS:||Gender Difference Gender Difference Gender differences are mostly determined by social behaviors.|
"Low numbers" for the purposes of this article, and for most applicants, are GMATs and GPAs at the lower end of or below the mid% range for a given school. Published: Mon, 5 Dec Today’s workforce is truly mixture of different races, ages, genders, ethnic groups, religions and lifestyles (Mor-Barak, ).
It is the job of the management of the organisation to fit together different pieces of mosaic in a harmonious, coordinated way and utilising the abilities and talents of each employee to its maximum.
The Force Opposing Universal Healthcare - James Madison once said, “Ambition must be made to counteract ambition”. In creating a new form of government, Madison tried to effectively plan for a Constitution that would account for the fact that human beings by nature are self-interested.
A Socratic perspective on the relationship between ignorance, human evil, and the examined life. This essay was originally published in the Current Contents print editions June 20, , when Clarivate Analytics was known as The Institute for Scientific Information® (ISI®).
The Online Writing Lab (OWL) at Purdue University houses writing resources and instructional material, and we provide these as a free service of the Writing Lab at Purdue.