The obligation of the rich to help the poor

Oct 2, While I think that more should be done to help the poor, I don't believe that the rich have a responsibility to help the poor people in society.

The obligation of the rich to help the poor

International Obligation and Human Health: The vast majority of these people will go without modern medical intervention or substantial treatment, and will rapidly develop AIDS.

Do wealthy people have a moral obligation to help the poor?

Governments have come to regard many forms of international assistance as the right thing to do if not a legal obligation. For example, when famine strikes, governments and citizens of the developed countries generally recognize that they ought to respond because they have a surplus of food and the means to deliver it to those who are starving.

Doing so is relatively easy and painless for those providing aid, yet it brings tremendous benefit to those in need. The degree to which assistance is provided varies, of course, but few would argue that the starving should be ignored.

Similar feelings of duty in the developed world arise with regard to natural disasters and adverse environmental changes, among other issues, and governments of the rich countries and indeed many of their private citizens and nongovernmental groups respond accordingly with increasing frequency, robustness, and speed.

We identify some reasons why more has not been done, and we show why more ought to be done. Sub-Saharan Africa is a case in point. And the situation is not improving. Poverty leads to poor health conditions generally, including the lack of treatment of conditions, such as sexually transmitted diseases, that make individuals more susceptible to HIV infection.

Poverty also creates exploitative working conditions that have been shown to foster the spread of HIV infection. Lack of alternative economic opportunities and poverty force women into formal and informal prostitution. The few options open to poor men include trucking and mining -- both occupations that have been documented as facilitating the spread of HIV.

When people become sick, families are forced to spend precious resources on any treatment options they can find. Sickness in adult family members means they cannot earn an income, grow or provide food. The eventual death of adults leaves children with no one to care for them.

The obligation of the rich to help the poor

They, and adult women survivors, may be forced into sex work to provide for themselves and their families, thereby multiplying not only their own suffering, but also the transmission of HIV. In poor countries that already suffer from a lack of formally trained professionals in education, health care, the military, and the government bureaucracy, AIDS has been devastating.

For instance, it has been estimated that a country with an HIV prevalence rate of 30 percent would lose between 3 percent and 7 percent of its health care workers annually to AIDS.

In Zambia in one year1, teachers died -- two-thirds of the number trained annually.

Nov 10,  · Yahoo Malaysia Answers Sign in Sign in Mail ⚙ Help Account Info; Help; Send Feedback. This article argues that the difference between poor countries and rich countries has to do with governance rather than resources, emphasizing the importance of public administration in explaining economic success and failure. This shows how important helping the poor was to Jesus, he wanted to spread the word to everyone he could that everyone should help those who need to be helped. A final example of a Christian’s obligation to help the poor is through the actual work of Jesus.

It undermines the very institutions that are meant to defend society -- its doctors, its teachers. For example, the explosive growth in the orphan population should give the world cause for alarm.

An estimated 12 million children have been orphaned by AIDS in sub-Saharan Africa, and absent significant intervention, that number is expected to grow to 40 million by Lacking these abilities and attributes, they will be less able to take on the work and family responsibilities necessary for national stability.

This is only one of many ways in which AIDS is undermining the economies and civil societies of African countries. What is more, in a forum sponsored by the Institute for Peace, international researchers and intelligence experts warned of a decrease in the GDP of sub-Saharan countries of as much as 20 percent over the next two decades, and the potential for extreme political instability and ethnic tension.

Equally worrying, some of these problems could occur in India as well. Further aggravating the poverty of the world's poorer countries is the staggering external debt they owe to wealthier countries and international financial institutions. Again, sub-Saharan Africa serves as a prominent, though by no means isolated, example.

Foreign aid cannot keep pace with the debt: And the opportunity cost of this debt servicing is equally great. Sub-Saharan Africa spends twice as much on debt servicing as it does on health care. Annan officially called for the establishment of the fund at the Organization of African Unity summit in Abuja, Nigeria, in Aprilas a way to follow up on the commitments made by the leaders of developed countries at the Okinawa Group of Eight Summit in July This certainly marked an important turnaround from the previously scant attention that the developed world had given to AIDS in Africa.

But developed countries have remained reticent about making meaningful financial contributions to the problem, and they have actively blocked efforts by developing countries' governments and activists around the globe to provide affordable treatment options for people in low-income countries.

Blocking Access to Medicine The relation of the developed world to the devastating poverty and circumstances aggravating AIDS in the developing world is of course complex.

At the very least, the developed world has stood in the way of the developing world's efforts to solve AIDS and other health-related problems in the most cost-effective ways possible. The developed world has, for example, repeatedly taken positions that give patent protections priority over public health in developing countries sometimes even stronger priority than prescribed by international treaties.

Brazil, South Africa, and Thailand are among the countries that have been overtly pressured by the U.Oct 02,  · We should help the poor because the spirit moves us to do good works.

Helping the Poor and Homeless

Thank You! x 5; Oct 2, #4. take from the rich and give to the poor, what is our obligation to the poor. US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum. Jan 07,  · Do we, in the rich western world, have an obligation to help those less fortunate than us? For example, refugees, or those living in absolute.

The rich aren't obligated to help the poor. But then again, the poor aren't obligated to buy into our society's notions of property and ownership. There's really no reason that they should continue to see your stuff as "your" stuff. So that’s the utilitarian case for there being a moral responsibility of the rich to help the poor.

Of course, one can argue on many other grounds (for example, on grounds of political justice) that we, the relatively rich in the developed world, have a responsibility to give more to the poor in . For example, you might want to emphasize that while you don't think that the rich have a legal obligation to help the poor, you feel that there is a moral imperative to do so.

The obligation of the rich to help the poor

In other words, you don't think we need to pass a law that says that wealthy people MUST help poor people, but you do think that wealthy people should help the poor out. Our poor are rich compared to much of the world. But in our culture, their poverty to them and to us is just as real as the person’s in PNG or in Haiti.

We have an obligation to help both. And to keep our own wealth in perspective — leading to both gratitude for our blessings and to responsibility in how we steward it and share it to meet.

Debate: Developed countries have a higher obligation to combat climate change - Debatepedia